Don't try to spin this to suit your needs. There is no proof that being a nudist or being gay is anything more than a choice made by an individual. It's easy to reject an argument when there is no way to spin it for your benefit. Let's not go on whether or not either one of us think it is a choice or genetic. Let's just say it is a given that neither has been proven to be genetic. This is no more than a comparison of 2 choices. Because we can say that gays can choose to live the lifestyle the same as a nudist chooses to live his or hers. I'm not asking for whether or not you condone it. I'm asking you to state why one choice has legal protection and one doesn't when both are deemed harmful to society. What say you now? Should we all have the right to run around naked everyday just because we choose to?